about us
adviser support
claiming benefits
contact us
disability alliance
disabled students support
home
links
membership
news
policy and campaigns
search
shop
site map
London Borough of Harrow v Nimco Hassan Ibrahim and the Secretary of State for the Home Department
Maria Teixeira v London Borough of Lambeth and the Secretary of State for the Home Department
These two European Court of Justice (ECJ) judgments concern whether, in certain circumstances, a person has a right to reside as the parent and primary carer of a child in education in a host Member State.
The court ruled that, in circumstances such as those in Ibrahim and Teixeira, the children of a national of a Member State who works or has worked in the host Member State, and the parent who is their primary carer, can claim a right of residence in the host Member State on the sole basis of Article 12 of Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68. This right is not conditional on that parent being self sufficient and having comprehensive sickness insurance.
The decision will affect future claims of income support (IS), income related employment and support allowance (ESA), income based jobseeker’s allowance (JSA), and state pension credit (SPC).
An EC national who claims one of these benefits will have a right to reside in GB under Article 12 of Regulation (EEC) 1612/68 if, at the date of claim to that benefit he or she satisfies all of the following:
The claimant is still required to pass the habitual residence test as a condition of receiving benefit.
The child of an A8 national migrant worker or an A2 national migrant worker will not gain rights under Article 12 of Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 during the Accession period unless and until the migrant worker has completed the necessary 12 months registered or authorised work, or the migrant worker is otherwise exempt from the requirement to register or seek authorisation to work in GB.
The Department for Work and Pensions has issued guidance (Memo DMG 30/10).